Medical review policy

What medical review means

A medically reviewed article should identify a named reviewer, relevant qualifications or registration details where appropriate, the scope of the review, and the date of review. Review is a quality check for medical accuracy and safety context; it is not a personal diagnosis or treatment recommendation.

What reviewers should check

• Meaningful medical claims are supported by suitable primary or authoritative sources.
• Benefits, risks, uncertainty, contraindications, and monitoring needs are not presented selectively.
• Time-sensitive details such as laws, prices, availability, and credentials are dated or qualified.
• Clinic marketing claims are distinguished from independent medical information.

Current site status

A page without a named reviewer and review date must not be described as medically reviewed. Current articles are general information and remain subject to the medical disclaimer. Clinic listings are directory information and are not clinical endorsements.

Conflicts and updates

Reviewers should disclose relevant conflicts, and material updates should trigger a new review or a clear explanation of what changed. A complete conflict-record and review-history workflow remains planned work.

Corrections

If you find a medical statement that needs correction, contact Tiger Health with the relevant article and source. Do not use the site for emergency care.